I'm going to start a series (probably not a continuous one...we'll do this from time to time) on potential players the Blazers could look at to help the point guard position. For those of you in the "don't make moves" category, don't worry...we'll also do one on Steve Blake at the end. While I certainly welcome discussion on the relative merits of our current players and the player under discussion I would appreciate it if the comment section weren't filled with twenty different versions of the "just stand pat and don't make any moves" post every time we talk about someone. Also understand that each player under discussion will fill a different role or need. We're not necessarily looking for a permanent starting point guard. Maybe we want a temporary one. Maybe we need a back-up. Maybe we just want to consolidate our three, and potentially four, guys now into a nice utility player. We'll cover all of those possibilities. Note that I'm not necessarily saying weshouldtrade for these guys, rather that wecould他们可能会至少值得一看。
We begin the series looking at an old friend:
Andre Miller,
6’2”200lbsAge 32
Last Season Averages:49% shooting, 17ppg, 6.9 apg, 36.7 mpg in 82 games
Career Averages:46% shooting, 14.4ppg. 7.5 apg, 34.8 minutes
Contract:$10.3 million for one more year
Let’s get something straight right off the bat.Andre Miller has a couple of flaws which would probably disqualify him from being the long-term point guard on this team.He can’t hit the long ball worth beans (in fact he seldom even tries) and he’s not a good defender.Plus he’s already 32.I don’t think anybody would be excited about signing him to a six-year deal.However he has a number of qualities which could recommend him strongly as just the kind of point guard the Blazers needthis year.Miller’s strongest quality has always been his ability to pass and run an offense.While he never quite fulfilled the all-world promise he showed in his first seasons in
Miller’s contract expires after this season, leaving him an unrestricted free agent.(This might inspire him to give us his best, by the way.)Should this mini-courtship work out perhaps something could be negotiated.More likely he would be an excellent transition piece as the younger point guards (Roy? Bayless? Sergio? Koponen?) continue to develop and ease into the point guard role.Acquiring Miller would consolidate our roster while still leaving Raef’s contract available to use as cap space or trade bait.His own contract would serve the same purpose.
The probable offer for Miller would be Steve Blake plus some combination of Channing Frye, Ike Diogu, and/or Sergio Rodriguez.Obviously Philly would have to value the play of Frye or the promise of Sergio to make it work from their end.I don’t believe the Blazers would move Martell Webster on a one-year player.
Even though this is obviously a short-term solution I would not be entirely disappointed if a trade like this happened.You can still draw a pretty clear line between the learning Blazers and the contending Blazers and next year falls into the learning category.However a guy like Miller would give them a kick start towards contending and provide pretty good value for what we’d give up.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
Loading comments...