本周我们处理一系列问题(还有一个问题有待解决),但除提出查询外,我基本上允许对话与允诺晚点表达我的观点
上周末我们请求三个Blazer名:你认为最有可能交换的Blazer名和Blazer名通缉对象最常看到交易, 和名Blazer你以为 其他人会提到
选择最易交易对象对我来说难度很大 。 我将解决Sergio Rodriguez问题, 仅仅因为路径现在似乎如此直通。 他想退出。他表现得正派,但非壮观。我们还有另一个年轻选择带点(像我的朋友Mr.Sergio/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/Server/ServerGolliver提醒我)通过今年的汇票再出的可能性 。最重要的是,我认为明年我们用同点卫士轮换方式进入上帝绿地是没有任何方法的 。我们需要更多经验备份, 无论是老兵后备队或开机手并移动Steve Blake到第二单元 。无论哪种方式, 都只有我们年轻人的一席空间。 总得有人去
Jerd Bayless今年夏天有可能移位仅仅因为他的值高点。我怀疑他会自己吸引上吨注意力,但会用Frye或Outlaw打包他会变得极有吸引力。Sergio只是没有一对特殊队外的相同调试。Jerd很可能是我的第二选择,原因前文都提到。
然然,只指名一个人,是Sergio
The guy I most want to see traded is easy for me: Channing Frye. It's not so much because of his play. It's certainly not because of his personality. I've mentioned before that he's the perfect Blazer everywhere but on the court. Under different circumstances I would love to see Channing stay here. But the Blazers can't utilize him fully and that's not good for him or the team. He's too young, too talented, and too stuck behind LaMarcus Aldridge to be here. He doesn't give us an appreciably different look at reserve power forward and he doesn't get enough minutes to showcase his talent. He could easily be playing 25-30 minutes per game somewhere. If he were 8 years further along in his career and looking for a career-crowning ring I'd love to have him. But he can't spend the next 8 years being a seldom-used understudy. He needs that chance to prove himself. I want him to get that chance. I want a team to get value out of him. If they can return some value to us in the process so much the better. But unless something drastic and unexpected happens with LaMarcus, Channing shouldn't be a Blazer this time next year.
The third name I had the most problems with of all. Perusing the lists people came up with in the thread (which were very good, by the way, as was the discussion) I have a hard time disagreeing with any of them. This is the first time in a while when the names we speculate should or might be traded actually are the names that could be traded. That shows our roster is solidifying. In any case I'm going to take the lame way out and say the guy on some other people's lists that shouldn't be there is "nobody". I understood letting the cake bake last season even though you knew it would probably cost us a chance to go as far as we might have with veterans. In actuality the Blazers got a lot farther than I thought they would, so bravo for the right move in that sense. But I think the time for figuring out is over. You know what you have in most of these players. More to the point you know what you yet need. It's time to fill some of those needs definitively. This roster still isn't balanced. We still have too many young guys in need of developmental time. You have to make a move sometime. If you lose a forward and/or point guard playing spot minutes now in order to get a guy you know brings a new wrinkle and will be in the rotation for the next couple years that's a good move.
The next question of the week was how important this 2009 draft is to the Blazers. We covered this in yesterday's podcast some. In most senses I believe this draft is only mildly important, and not just because we're talking the #24 selection instead of a lottery pick. The value of youth is going to be downplayed for the next couple of years as this team seeks to make serious noise in the playoffs. The major players are set. Most of the starting spots are filled or stocked with possible candidates. Point guard is the exception but I've already shared my feelings about banking on a rookie point guard and riding the growth curve with him for the next 3-5 years. There aren't that many waves left to be made. You're probably talking about drafting an eventual back-up player. That could become critical down the road. You might be able to get a nice piece. But it's still a back-up player.
播客上我是认真的 我说Blazers可能只是卡住24线程摘取 。 他们可能不愿意放弃资产向溢价点移动 。 他们可能找不到中轮有吸引力者 。 他们可能也找不到任何有吸引力出价从手取24。 我不认为Blazers想用该选取卡住,但他们可能看不到更好的替代方法 。
如果替代选择本身出现,我打赌它的形式是向某人购买选择权或使用Ruffin交易异常项,而不是交换24项线程高点选择
I think the draft could show more about management's assessment of the current roster than their assessment of whatever player they select. If they pick at 24 or trade out that's not much of a clue. But if they trade up to get somebody it'll show where they think changes need to come. If they move up to take a point guard somebody else is moving. It'll be one of the young guys. Drafting a point guard would mean that the team has confidence in Steve Blake at the helm this year or they have a deal in the works for a starter. If they move up to take a forward then somebody else could be moving.
重覆,我猜想24点时他们会选择, 表示没有什么别的事情可以做, 选择除此以外不会表示更多其他事, 而这是他们认为最佳选手能到的位置。 正因如此,我怀疑这个试卷会带出震地新闻或变化
最后一个问题就是确定最关键的问题Blazers今年夏天会处理。我想说点卫士和我会说,如果我们谈论事物管理控制或改变,我愿意打赌Nate会反覆暴动,如果老兵不提供帮助的话。
But to me even that issue pales in comparison to the continued development of Greg Oden. Greg has to keep the weight down, continue to strengthen his base, and work on his lateral movement, his low post footwork, and his spins and hooks. If Oden comes into camp in shape, ready to play, and dedicated to kicking butt in the league this year this team becomes pretty scary. If he's not looking any better than he did at the end of last season, or worse has regressed, the Blazers will be treading water this year trying to match their 2008-09 performance. This team needs to leap ahead, if not in win total at least in style and consistency of play, and the biggest potential leap comes in the person of Greg Oden. He's followed by Martell Webster, Nicolas Batum, Rudy Fernandez, and Jerryd Bayless but even those four worthies can't match his potential impact on the 2009-10 season.
全部回答本周问题 自由告诉我评语中我哪里出错
加载注释...